Lexical decision for open- and closed-class words: failure to replicate differential frequency sensitivity.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Bradley and her colleagues (D. C. Bradley, Computarional distinctions of vocabulary type, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1978; D. C. Bradley, M. E. Garrett, & E. B. Zurif, in D. Caplan (Ed.), Biological studies ofmenra/ processes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1980) have reported a marked difference in frequency sensitivity between openand closedclass words on a lexical decision task. This effect was obtained with normal subjects, but not with Broca’s aphasics. Their results have already influenced experimental and theoretical investigations of syntactic processing. However, in three lexical decision experiments with normal subjects, modeled on those of Bradley et al., we failed to find such a theoretically interesting difference between the two classes. Instead, both classes showed similar reaction time frequency sensitivity for word frequencies less than approximately 316/million (H. Kucera & W. N. Francis, Computational analysis of presenf-day English, Providence, RI: Brown Univ. Press, 1967, count); above 399/million, the closed class had an almost-flat function of reaction time versus the logarithm of the frequency, while the open class may have had too few members for meaningful assessment. Because reaction time may be a nonlinear function of log frequency, and because there is relatively little overlap between the frequency ranges of the two classes, comparisons of the members of the two classes which might straddle the function’s inflection point must be made with extreme caution.
منابع مشابه
Lexical access and frequency sensitivity: frequency saturation and open/closed class equivalence.
Whether closed-class words use the same lexical access route(s) as open-class words has been intensely debated recently. Differences in frequency sensitivity have been suggested as one manifestation of separable access routes. However, all the lexical decision studies have been limited by floor effects at the higher frequency ranges which could mask theoretically important differences in the be...
متن کاملEffects of frequency on the auditory perception of open- versus closed-class words
Over the past couple of decades, it has been repeatedly investigated whether open-class items are processed in a different way from closed-class items. Most studies, however, have been bedeviled by difficulties in controlling all relevant distinctions between openand closed-class items. For example, whereas openclass items have a relatively low frequency of occurrence, closedclass words have a ...
متن کاملClosed- and open-class lexical access in agrammatic and fluent aphasics.
Bradley, Garrett, and Zurif (Bradley, Computational distinctions of vocabulary type. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT Press; Cambridge, MA, 1978; Biological studies of mental processes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1980) have suggested that closed-class word access is normally mediated by a different route than the open-class one, and that the loss of this closed-class route might account fo...
متن کاملElectrophysiological signatures of visual lexical processing: open- and closed-class words.
This paper presents evidence of the disputed existence of an electrophysiological marker for the lexical-categorical distinction between open- and closed-class words. Event-related brain potentials were recorded from the scalp while subjects read a story. Separate waveforms were computed for open- and closed-class words. Two aspects of the waveforms could be reliably related to vocabulary class...
متن کاملThe word frequency effect and lexical access.
Some recent experiments suggest that only open class words show a frequency effect. Closed class items are accessed independently of their frequency. We carried out five experiments to test the validity of this hypothesis for the French language. All our results suggest that the frequency effect applies equally well to the open and closed class items.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Brain and language
دوره 15 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1982